Download Crazies to the Left of Me, Wimps to the Right: How One Side by Bernard Goldberg PDF

By Bernard Goldberg

Adequate of the leftist lunatics like Rosie O'Donnell who imagine "Radical Christians" are "as significant a risk to the United States as Radical Muslims." sufficient of the hyperbolic liberal rhetoric evaluating Bush to Saddam and Mel Gibson to Hitler. sufficient of the hyper-partisan, ultra-PC liberal media, which frequently appear extra sympathetic to the "victims of humiliation" at Abu Ghraib than to our troops death by the hands of Iraqi fundamentalists. adequate, too, of the gutless wonders at the correct who shouldn't have the braveness to face up for his or her personal convictions. sufficient in their pandering, trolling for votes, and outspending the Democrats. Now with strong and provocative new fabric, Bernard Goldberg's Crazies to the Left of Me, Wimps to the best sounds an excellent louder alarm than before—warning that, if the wimps at the correct do not regain their braveness and reclaim their ideas, the crazies at the left simply could win the White apartment in '08.

Show description

Read or Download Crazies to the Left of Me, Wimps to the Right: How One Side Lost Its Mind and the Other Lost Its Nerve PDF

Similar conservatism & liberalism books

Voice of Reason: Why the Left and Right Are Wrong

Ronn Owens Winner of the 2003 Marconi Radio Award for significant industry character of the Year
"Throughout the numerous years I’ve recognized Ronn Owens, I’ve constructed a deep appreciate for his wisdom of matters and for his unusual universal contact. there are various good stuff i will say approximately Ronn, however the factor i love such a lot approximately him is his equity. And our public discourse is the higher for it. "
–U. S. Senator Joe Lieberman (D-CT)
"Whether you end up agreeing with him a lot of the time or now not, Ronn Owens is rarely uninteresting or given to predictable knee-jerk evaluations. to the contrary, you could continuously depend on him to be fascinating and reasonable, and to problem stereotypes at the correct and left in pursuit of solutions to difficulties that many others take advantage of to deepen the divisions within the kingdom. "
–U. S. Senator John McCain (R-AZ)
"I have identified Ronn Owens for over twenty years, and i've the maximum appreciate for him. Many radio speak convey hosts at the present time come from the a ways correct or the a long way left. Ronn Owens doesn't. He bases his judgements on cause and customary experience. "
–U. S. Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
"Ronn Owens is a nook shop for logic. He’s acquired the shrewdpermanent sturdy a part of liberalism and the clever difficult a part of conservatism. He’s road shrewdpermanent, well-read, and offers a rattling. "
–Chris Matthews, host of Hardball on MSNBC and The Chris Matthews express on CNBC
"Ronn Owens isn't left or correct and absolutely isn't consistently improper! yet he yes does make you think that. "
–Tim Russert, host of Meet the Press
"People are looking to order a l. a. carte. They don’t wish the dinner both occasion deals. An appetizer of pro-choice shouldn’t suggest a moment process excessive taxes. You shouldn’t need to swallow the NRA’s baloney to deliver your taxes down. this can be what Ronn Owens is all about–neither social gathering, neither ideology, simply good judgment and political independence. "
–Dick Morris, FOX information Channel Political Analyst

Unions, Radicals, and Democratic Presidents: Seeking Social Change in the Twentieth Century (Contributions in American History)

Social swap advocates received a extraordinary sequence of victories through the twentieth century. This learn examines either winning and unsuccessful efforts, starting from the women's suffrage circulation of the 1910s to the divisive debate among Gore and Nader supporters through the 2000 election. Halpern information the parts necessary to shaping innovative campaigns.

Liberalism and Its Critics (Readings in Social and Political Theory)

A lot modern political philosophy has been a debate among utilitarianism at the one hand and Kantian, or rights-based ethic has lately confronted a turning out to be problem from a distinct course, from a view that argues for a deeper knowing of citizenship and group than the liberal ethic permits.

Wingnuts: How the Lunatic Fringe is Hijacking America

What’s a Wingnut? It’s anyone at the far-right wing or far-left wing of the political spectrum - the pro partisans and the unhinged activists, the hardcore haters and the paranoid conspiracy theorists. They’re the folks who regularly attempt to divide us rather than unite us. Wingnuts seems to be on the outbreak of extremism within the beginning years of the Obama management – from the remarkable executive spending that spurred the Tea-Party protests to the onset of Obama Derangement Syndrome.

Extra info for Crazies to the Left of Me, Wimps to the Right: How One Side Lost Its Mind and the Other Lost Its Nerve

Example text

Let’s leave the small stuff to smaller minds and get to what is truly important: Why, indeed, do liberals detest Fox News with such a burning passion? Why do they hate Bill O’Reilly more than Osama bin Laden and almost as much as Dick Cheney? Why, in places like the Upper West Side of Manhattan, do their eyes roll reflexively at the mere mention of the words “Fox News,” in much the same way as your leg jerks when the doctor hits your knee with a rubber hammer? Why, in other words, does Fox News loom so large in the fevered liberal imagination?

When did Republicans lose their nerve on race? And why? I suspect it has something to do with the Democrats’ all-purpose bogeyman, Karl Rove, who has always been trolling for votes— even before George W. Bush became a lame duck. Pick up a few black votes here and a few more there, and who knows, maybe it could change the outcome of an election. But the pandering has its roots not just in political practicality, but also in fear. Race is, after all, the most volatile issue in American life. And for white politicians it’s also the most terrifying, “one that, at the merest whiff of a charge of ‘racism,’ transforms even normally principled leaders into panderers and cowards,” as Harry Stein once put it in a piece for City Journal magazine.

This is their great certainty in life, that Fox is a network for boobs, hayseeds, and bigots. But even though this gives libs with Fox derangement syndrome delusions of grandeur, oddly, it doesn’t really give them comfort. It just makes them even angrier. So, in the end, this isn’t about Bill O’Reilly, or Sean Hannity, or Brit Hume, or Roger Ailes, or anybody else at Fox. In the end, this is about liberals themselves and the serious psychological problem they’re having adapting to a changing world.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.71 of 5 – based on 30 votes